theonlycabbage:

tonysopranobignaturals-deactiva:

me normally: i’m not personally a huge fan of modern art

me around right wingers: I love modern art sooooo much and I think there should be litter boxes in schools also

fucking obliterated lmao

(via dicksmasher)

rimonoroni2:

tomboyism is so funny to me. gender non-conformity for girls is acceptable for like two minutes between the ages of 8 and 10. beyond that it’s appalling and you’re a freak but for those two years…… they could’ve had it all

the-real-seebs:

aetherograph:

interrogationspecialist:

roadhogsbigbelly:

roadhogsbigbelly:

roadhogsbigbelly:

my issue with the argument that “disliking ai art is inherently reactionary” is that it acts like pro-ai art people are somehow less reactionary on their views on art, when like the majority of defense’s of ai art as like a higher form art are indistinguishable from the arguments people use to defend the art of like. hitler

like the logic is that hitler was actually a great artist, entirely hinges on the belief that “objectively good art” is just art that looks detailed if you’ve never drawn before, which like why ai artists who want to prove their actual artists will just make a pretty looking building or lady, cause it’s all about aesthetics i guess

like i’m not saying your a nazi if you like ai art, i just think it’s silly when people act like anti-ai artist’s are just hysterical luddites, and that ai artists are the ONLY people who actually care about art, when 99 percent of ai artists on twitter only care about art that’s “beautiful” on an extremely superficial level.

Jacob Geller dissected the intersection of Fascism and modern art in 2020, sadly before the AI art boom, and goes into better detail than I can about how abstraction is a threat to fascist ideals. I also want to draw attention to possibly my favorite commentary on modernism.

Comic by Ad Reinhardt, an abstract painter, who’s made multiple comics about art and perception.

AI slop only bring repetition and lack of original idea to the table. it’s an advanced form of stolen art collage. It seeks only to trace and multiply without provoking. It’s the anthesis of art.

The way I explained it to my young cousin was like this:

Back before cameras, paintings were just recording reality, and that’s why painters tried to be as realistic as they could, and only paint things that could exist in the world around them–objects, and people, and animals. Sometimes they did paint things from their imagination, but only to illustrate stories, like stories from their religion.

Then, cameras came along, and painters were free to paint things cameras couldn’t see–things like the artist’s feelings, or ideas, or thoughts, or lots of things. Some artists tried to see if they could paint from every angle at once, and we call that Cubism. Some artists tried to paint very quickly, as quickly as they could, so they could capture one single moment of the daylight, or their impression of a moment, with all the feelings light gives, and that’s why we call them Impressionists. Some artists were more interested in the process of painting, like Mr Rothko; or in finding the most intense versions of a colour, like Mr Klein. Some were more interested in the spaces between things, like Mr Mondrian. But art, after cameras, could suddenly SAY something, say something by itself! And art, as it turns out, has a lot to say!

“I can do that too! I can do that!” You can, little friend! We all can!

My little cousin didn’t get mad looking at modern art; she was excited, and asked her parents if she could have fancy grown-up paints, because she didn’t know Art could be something she could do, could be something about expressing her feelings and ideas. This is a child who can’t yet write very well, and not nearly as fast or as well as she speaks, so you have to understand something clicked for her, that she could express the complex human things inside herself with colour and shapes and images, instead of struggling to learn how to spell “melancholy” or “excited” or conjugate verbs to a degree that could encompass it.

Because words take TIME to master as an art form–I should know, I’ve been practising using them to express MY ideas and feelings artistically for 36-and-a-half years! Paint, however, doesn’t require such mastery in order to begin expressing the artist; certainly it helps to know skills, but it isn’t as required as it is with words. You can just scream and yell with paint, you can experiment more purely with images than with sounds, which after all are regimented into languages before we can begin to use them at all, let alone for the art words make.

And honestly, why are whole-ass adults not understanding that “I could make that!” should be exciting, should inspire you to go and make that! Why are you so mad? “I could make that!” Yes you can! And you get to! And you’re an adult, you don’t have to ask your parents to buy you paint and canvas and brushes, you can go and do that yourself and be expressing your own feelings this very afternoon! Nothing is stopping you! You don’t NEED that plagiarism machine, you can do better art yourself! And nobody else in the whole world, now or in the past or in the future, is EVER going to be able to make the art YOU can make, the art YOU have inside you! So go make it!

i don’t think the arguments for or against ai art have a monopoly on being the same sorts of reactionary thing you see in people attacking modern art or whatever. i’ve seen the same shit in both directions.

it’s a new kind of medium and people will use it and make things that reflect something about the person making them and we don’t know what that will be like yet, and that’s probably fine.

gotinterest:

driving in the city is all about using your maximum amount of brain power to avoid a vehicular manslaughter charge while seemingly everyone else around you has made it their holy mission to get hit by your car

nycstark:

a court of thorns and roses. ballad of songbirds and snakes. bowl of macaroni and cheese

(via sleepystellarsister)

jacka1:

tiktoksthataregood-ish:

(via sleepystellarsister)

neonscrapyard:

you can do it, magikarp!

[art by me - neonscrapyard]

instagram || etsy

noknowshame:

I’m watching Splash (1984) which is a romcom about a guy who falls in love with a mermaid, and when she chooses a human name she chooses Madison and guy says “that’s not a real name, but alright” which seems to imply that Madison was not a name until at least the 80’s and all girls named Madison are actually named after the mermaid. thought you should know

(via amuseoffyre)

fgrobichiko:

elbiotipo:

effemimaniac:

fuckyeahcoelacanths:

membraneshock:

rip to all the “fuckyeah___” blogs that carried our society at one point </3

we are in the midst of a true Real One

Dude the fact a COELACANTH blog is the one that survived when the rest died off……..

(via dicksmasher)

copepods:

i like working at plant store. sometimes you ring up someone and there’s a slug on their plant and so you’re like “Oh haha you’ve got a friend there let me get that for you” and you put the slug on your hand for safekeeping but then its really busy and you dont have time to take the slug outside before the next customer in line so you just have a slug chilling on your hand for 15 minutes. really makes you feel at peace with nature. also it means sometimes i get to say my favorite line which is “would you like this free slug with your purchase”